Corp-Ethics Home
Log In | Register New User
Home Company Search Related Articles Forum (new!)

Company Fannie Mae [Company Info]
  Track this Company (an email will be sent to you everytime a report is filed about this company)

Date Issue Title
16th Dec 2004 Questionable Practice Fannie Mae 'should restate books'

US mortgage company Fannie Mae should restate its earnings, the US finance watchdog has said, a move that could put a major dent in its finances

The Securities & Exchange Commission accused Fannie Mae of using techniques that "did not comply in material respects" with accounting standards. Last month Fannie Mae warned that the problems could cost it $9bn (4.6bn).

Fannie Mae shares fell $1.54, or 2%, to $69.15 in midday trading on Thursday at the New York Stock Exchange.

The other main US mortgage firm Freddie Mac restated earnings by $5bn last year after a probe of its books. The SEC's comments are likely to increase pressure on Congress to strengthen supervision of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

The move is also likely to be seen as a blow to Fannie Mae chief executive Franklin Raines who has defended his firm's accounting practices to policymakers.

A Fannie Mae spokesman said that the company "will take the steps necessary to comply fully with the SEC's determination". Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are key parts of the US financial system.

They effectively underwrite the mortgage market, financing nearly half of all American house purchases and dealing actively in bonds and other financial instruments.

An investigation of Freddie Mac in June 2003 sparked concerns about the wider health of the industry and the role of its main regulator the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO).

Having been pricked into action, the OFHEO turned its attention to Fannie May.

In September this year the OFHEO announced that the firm had tweaked its books to spread earnings more smoothly across quarters and play down the amount of risk it had taken on.

The SEC found similar problems in the months between 2001 and mid-2004.

The watchdog's chief accountant Donald Nicolaisen said that "Fannie Mae's methodology of assessing, measuring and documenting hedge ineffectiveness was inadequate and was not supported" by generally accepted accounting principles.

He continued that the company should "restate its financial statements filed with the commission to eliminate the use of hedge accounting" among other step.

As a result, he said he had "advised that... to provide investors with appropriate information, Fannie Mae should restate its financial statements".

Other Reports on Fannie Mae
Date Issue Company Report
22nd Dec 2004 Other Issue Fannie Mae Senior Fannie Mae bosses resign
24th Sep 2004 Fraud Investigation Fannie Mae Fannie Mae in government probe
20th Jun 2003 Fraud Investigation Fannie Mae Fannie Accounting

Related Reports from the Financial Industry
Company Issue Report
Equitable Life Questionable Practice Equitable chiefs face fresh probe
Norwich Union Other Issue Norwich Union fined on 3m fraud
Xsavi Questionable Practice Broker banned over illegal sales
KPMG Fraud Investigation KPMG Partner Pleads Guilty In Tax Shelter Case
Royal Liver Questionable Practice Royal Liver fined for mis-selling
Contact Us | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Add Report | Links
© 2006 | Corporate Ethics