|Home||Company Search||Related Articles||Forum (new!)|
|Company||GlaxoSmithKline [Company Info]|
|Track this Company (an email will be sent to you everytime a report is filed about this company)|
|25th Jun 2003||Questionable Practice||Ordered to pull misleading adverts|
|The US government has ordered a drug giant to quit running a series of radio and newspaper ads that call the allergy spray Flonase a cost-effective alternative to pricey allergy pills.
The ad campaign urged allergy sufferers to ask their doctor about Flonase, a nasal spray, instead of antihistamine pills like Allegra and Zyrtec. Flonase maker GlaxoSmithKline began the ads shortly after insurance companies raised prices for the pills this spring.
But the Food and Drug Administration says the ads falsely imply that Flonase is fully interchangeable with the other drugs -- when in fact, it relieves only nasal symptoms and the pills can relieve itchy allergy-afflicted eyes, too.
Flonase "is neither therapeutically equivalent to the oral antihistamines nor interchangeable with or substitutable for them," the FDA wrote GlaxoSmithKline last week, in a letter posted to the agency's Web site Tuesday.
The ads had already quit running by the time the FDA complained, said Glaxo spokeswoman Lisa Behrens. She said the company thought it had accurately described the differences between Flonase and allergy pills, but that it would "work in compliance with the FDA" in developing future ads.
|Other Reports on GlaxoSmithKline|
|29th Jan 2007||Questionable Practice||GlaxoSmithKline||GSK hid paxil suicide link|
|10th Aug 2006||Other Issue||GlaxoSmithKline||Glaxo pays $70m to end price row|
|29th Mar 2006||Questionable Practice||GlaxoSmithKline||Glaxo agrees US Paxil settlement|
|18th Mar 2005||Other Issue||GlaxoSmithKline||Glaxo shares dip on factory probe|
|22nd Sep 2004||Questionable Practice||GlaxoSmithKline||Glaxo drops appeal in Aids drug pricing case|
|6th Sep 2004||Other Issue||GlaxoSmithKline||GSK faces anti-depressant lawsuit|
|19th May 2004||Other Issue||GlaxoSmithKline||New York sues GlaxoSmithKline|
|11th May 2004||Fraud Investigation||GlaxoSmithKline||GlaxoSmithKline faces antitrust investigation|
|22nd Jan 2004||Fraud Investigation||GlaxoSmithKline||$11.1 Million settlement|
|8th Jan 2004||Questionable Practice||GlaxoSmithKline||£1.5bn Tax Bill|
|16th Dec 2003||Questionable Practice||GlaxoSmithKline||Glaxo's CEO to scoop 5.7 mln stg a year|
|25th Jun 2003||Questionable Practice||GlaxoSmithKline||FDA tells Glaxo to pull misleading Flonase ads|
|Related Reports from the Pharamaceutical Industry|
|Merck||Other Issue||Merck may owe taxman $2 billion|
|Pfizer||Questionable Practice||State Tax Report|
|Merck||Other Issue||Merck fined $9m in Vioxx lawsuit|
|Merck||Other Issue||US giant punished for faulty drug|
|Bayer||Fraud Investigation||$11.1 Million settlement|
|© 2006 Corp-Ethics.com | Corporate Ethics|