|Home||Company Search||Related Articles||Forum (new!)|
|Company||Microsoft Corporation [Company Info]|
|Track this Company (an email will be sent to you everytime a report is filed about this company)|
|18th Mar 2005||Other Issue||EU warns on Microsoft behaviour|
|Microsoft has not done enough to comply with sanctions imposed for breaking European anti-trust rules, the European Commission (EC) has said.
The software giant was censured in 2004 for misusing its monopoly position in desktop PCs to extend its reach into other areas.
The firm agreed to a 497m euro ($660m, £345m) fine and to make its software work better with competitors' products.
But an EC spokesman said Microsoft was failing to deliver on its commitments.
"On the basis of market test results, we have serious doubts that Microsoft is complying with the interoperability remedy," EU competition spokesman Jonathan Todd said.
The European Commission said the group had failed on four counts. It was difficult for companies that wanted to licence Microsoft data protocols to get access to its documentation.
Furthermore, companies which wanted to take out a licence would have to pay for an extensive one that also covered items they did not want.
Another limitation was that developers of open source software, which compete with Microsoft in providing software for server computers, could not gain access to the protocols.
But the biggest problem, said Mr Todd, was that: "It would appear that the level of royalties applied would be unjustified."
Interoperability has long been the main charge levelled against the Seattle-based firm, whose Windows operating system powers nine out of 10 personal computers around the world.
Its dominance is much less marked in the market for servers - larger computers which store and distribute data and run networks - and for audio-video software.
In both areas, the EC ruled that Microsoft had made it more difficult for other companies to make their products compatible with Windows PCs - restricting their markets and boosting its own market share.
Under European Union law, companies with dominance in a market face restrictions on their use of that power to leverage market share elsewhere.
Microsoft said it was pleased to have the results of the European Commission's market testing "as it enables us to respond promptly in an appropriate way to work through the issues raised with the Commission".
|Other Reports on Microsoft Corporation|
|10th Jun 2011||Other Issue||Microsoft Corporation||Microsoft must pay $290m for patent infringement|
|27th Feb 2008||Questionable Practice||Microsoft Corporation||EU fines Microsoft record $1.4bn|
|22nd Sep 2007||Other Issue||Microsoft Corporation||Microsoft loses anti-trust appeal|
|19th Sep 2006||Other Issue||Microsoft Corporation||Microsoft accused over Vista row|
|12th Jul 2006||Other Issue||Microsoft Corporation||Microsoft hit with 280m euro fine|
|18th Apr 2006||Other Issue||Microsoft Corporation||Microsoft loses out again in EU row|
|10th Mar 2006||Questionable Practice||Microsoft Corporation||Microsoft faces new fines threat|
|26th Jan 2006||Other Issue||Microsoft Corporation||Microsoft may still face EU fine|
|22nd Dec 2005||Questionable Practice||Microsoft Corporation||Microsoft may face daily EU fine|
|7th Dec 2005||Other Issue||Microsoft Corporation||South Korea fines Microsoft $32m|
|1st Jul 2005||Other Issue||Microsoft Corporation||Microsoft pays out $775m to IBM|
|15th Jun 2005||Questionable Practice||Microsoft Corporation||Microsoft helps China to censor bloggers|
|28th Jun 2004||Other Issue||Microsoft Corporation||Microsoft settles anti-trust case|
|13th Apr 2004||Other Issue||Microsoft Corporation||Microsoft settles patents case|
|24th Mar 2004||Other Issue||Microsoft Corporation||Microsoft hit by record EU fine|
|19th Mar 2004||Questionable Practice||Microsoft Corporation||Microsoft facing EU fines|
|27th Jan 2004||Questionable Practice||Microsoft Corporation||EU Anti Competition Investigation|
|15th Dec 2003||Questionable Practice||Microsoft Corporation||Microsoft abandons older Windows|
|8th Jul 2003||Questionable Practice||Microsoft Corporation||Microsoft faces new probe|
|Related Reports from the Computing & IT Industry|
|Dell||Questionable Practice||Dell restates profits after probe|
|Livedoor||Other Issue||Livedoor shareholder to sue firm|
|Other Issue||Google click-fraud deal approved|
|Livedoor||Fraud Investigation||Top Japanese fund manager charged|
|Livedoor||Fraud Investigation||Livedoor's Horie pleads innocence|
|© 2006 Corp-Ethics.com | Corporate Ethics|