|Home||Company Search||Related Articles||Forum (new!)|
|Company||Microsoft Corporation [Company Info]|
|Track this Company (an email will be sent to you everytime a report is filed about this company)|
|15th Jun 2005||Questionable Practice||Microsoft helps China to censor bloggers|
|Civil liberties groups have condemned an arrangement between Microsoft and Chinese authorities to censor the internet.
The American company is helping censors remove "freedom" and "democracy" from the net in China with a software package that prevents bloggers from using these and other politically sensitive words on their websites.
The restrictions, which also include an automated denial of "human rights", are built into MSN Spaces, a blog service launched in China last month by Shanghai MSN Network Communications Technology, a venture in which Microsoft holds a 50% stake.
Users who try to include such terms in subject lines are warned: "This topic contains forbidden words. Please delete them."
Even the most basic political discussion is difficult because "communism", "socialism", and "capitalism" are blocked in this way, although these words can be used in the body of the main text. Many taboo words are predictable, such as "Taiwanese independence", "Tibet", "Dalai Lama", "Falun Gong", "terrorism" and "massacre". But there are also quirks that reflect the embryonic nature of net censorship and the propaganda ministry's perceived threats.
The word "demonstration" is taboo, but "protest" is all right; "democracy" is forbidden, but "anarchy" and "revolution" are acceptable. On MSN Space, Chinese bloggers cannot use the name of their own president, but can comment on Tony Blair. "Tiananmen" cannot be mentioned.
A Microsoft spokesman said the restrictions were the price the company had to pay to spread the positive benefits of blogs and online messaging.
"Even with the filters, we're helping millions of people communicate, share stories, share photographs and build relationships. For us, that is the key point here," Adam Sohn, a global sales and marketing director at MSN, told the Associated Press news agency.
For the Chinese government, which employs an estimated 30,000 internet police, the restrictions are an extension of a long-standing policy to control the web so that it can be used by businesses but not by political opponents.
For Microsoft, it appears to be a concession to authoritarianism on the net. It comes only months after Microsoft's boss, Bill Gates, praised China's leaders, who have mixed market economics with rigid political control. "It is a brand new form of capitalism, and as a consumer it's the best thing that ever happened," he said.
Along with a throng of other net giants, Microsoft is trying to make inroads into China's fast-growing internet market, expected to top 100 million users this year. Only the United States has more people online, but Mr Gates admitted this year that his company was underperforming in China.
Microsoft is not alone in accepting censorship requests from China. The free-speech group, Reporters Without Borders, says Yahoo has a similar policy. The group said any justification for collaborating with Chinese censorship based on obeying local laws did "not hold water". The multinationals must "respect certain basic ethical principles" wherever they operated.
China's information industry ministry, meanwhile, has ordered owners of blogs and bulletin boards to register their sites by the end of this month or have them shut down.
The ministry's website said: "The internet has profited many people, but it also has brought many problems, such as sex, violence and feudal superstitions and other harmful information that has seriously poisoned people's spirits."
|Other Reports on Microsoft Corporation|
|10th Jun 2011||Other Issue||Microsoft Corporation||Microsoft must pay $290m for patent infringement|
|27th Feb 2008||Questionable Practice||Microsoft Corporation||EU fines Microsoft record $1.4bn|
|22nd Sep 2007||Other Issue||Microsoft Corporation||Microsoft loses anti-trust appeal|
|19th Sep 2006||Other Issue||Microsoft Corporation||Microsoft accused over Vista row|
|12th Jul 2006||Other Issue||Microsoft Corporation||Microsoft hit with 280m euro fine|
|18th Apr 2006||Other Issue||Microsoft Corporation||Microsoft loses out again in EU row|
|10th Mar 2006||Questionable Practice||Microsoft Corporation||Microsoft faces new fines threat|
|26th Jan 2006||Other Issue||Microsoft Corporation||Microsoft may still face EU fine|
|22nd Dec 2005||Questionable Practice||Microsoft Corporation||Microsoft may face daily EU fine|
|7th Dec 2005||Other Issue||Microsoft Corporation||South Korea fines Microsoft $32m|
|1st Jul 2005||Other Issue||Microsoft Corporation||Microsoft pays out $775m to IBM|
|18th Mar 2005||Other Issue||Microsoft Corporation||EU warns on Microsoft behaviour|
|28th Jun 2004||Other Issue||Microsoft Corporation||Microsoft settles anti-trust case|
|13th Apr 2004||Other Issue||Microsoft Corporation||Microsoft settles patents case|
|24th Mar 2004||Other Issue||Microsoft Corporation||Microsoft hit by record EU fine|
|19th Mar 2004||Questionable Practice||Microsoft Corporation||Microsoft facing EU fines|
|27th Jan 2004||Questionable Practice||Microsoft Corporation||EU Anti Competition Investigation|
|15th Dec 2003||Questionable Practice||Microsoft Corporation||Microsoft abandons older Windows|
|8th Jul 2003||Questionable Practice||Microsoft Corporation||Microsoft faces new probe|
|Related Reports from the Computing & IT Industry|
|AOL TimeWarner||Questionable Practice||Excessive Spending|
|AOL TimeWarner||Questionable Practice||AOL pays out after Spitzer probe|
|Livedoor||Fraud Investigation||Japanese tycoon and his staff guilty of fraud|
|AOL TimeWarner||Questionable Practice||Time Warner to Pay $2.4 Billion for AOL Suit|
|Livedoor||Other Issue||Livedoor shareholder to sue firm|
|© 2006 Corp-Ethics.com | Corporate Ethics|