|Home||Company Search||Related Articles||Forum (new!)|
|Company||Microsoft Corporation [Company Info]|
|Track this Company (an email will be sent to you everytime a report is filed about this company)|
|1st Jul 2005||Other Issue||Microsoft pays out $775m to IBM|
|Microsoft is to pay $775m (£438.4m) to computer giant IBM to settle an anti-trust claim.
Under the settlement, the software maker will also give IBM a $75m credit for its computer programmes.
Microsoft said the settlement resolves discriminatory pricing and overcharging allegations made by IBM.
The action dates back to a 1990s US federal case which found Microsoft had been acting as a monopoly by forcing computer firms to take its software.
The $775m payout is the latest in a long line of such payments following the action brought by the US Department of Justice - last year Microsoft agreed to pay $2bn to Sun Microsystems.
n 2004, the European Commission also fined the software group $597m for similar monopoly allegations, Microsoft was also forced to make a version of its Windows XP software that does not contain Real player - known as Windows XP Home Edition N.
"With these antitrust issues behind us, both Microsoft and IBM can move ahead, at times cooperatively and at times competitively, to bring the best products and services to customers," said Brad Smith, Microsoft's general counsel and senior vice president.
"This is a significant step toward our efforts to resolve these issues with other companies," he added.
One major anti-trust action brought by RealNetworks against the software giant remains, as well as several other smaller cases.
The case does also not resolve another outstanding claim launched by IBM.
The computer group alleges that Microsoft's software dominance damaged its server hardware and software business.
However, IBM has said it will not launch any compensation claims in the case for two years - it will also limit such claims to damages suffered after June 2002.
|Other Reports on Microsoft Corporation|
|10th Jun 2011||Other Issue||Microsoft Corporation||Microsoft must pay $290m for patent infringement|
|27th Feb 2008||Questionable Practice||Microsoft Corporation||EU fines Microsoft record $1.4bn|
|22nd Sep 2007||Other Issue||Microsoft Corporation||Microsoft loses anti-trust appeal|
|19th Sep 2006||Other Issue||Microsoft Corporation||Microsoft accused over Vista row|
|12th Jul 2006||Other Issue||Microsoft Corporation||Microsoft hit with 280m euro fine|
|18th Apr 2006||Other Issue||Microsoft Corporation||Microsoft loses out again in EU row|
|10th Mar 2006||Questionable Practice||Microsoft Corporation||Microsoft faces new fines threat|
|26th Jan 2006||Other Issue||Microsoft Corporation||Microsoft may still face EU fine|
|22nd Dec 2005||Questionable Practice||Microsoft Corporation||Microsoft may face daily EU fine|
|7th Dec 2005||Other Issue||Microsoft Corporation||South Korea fines Microsoft $32m|
|15th Jun 2005||Questionable Practice||Microsoft Corporation||Microsoft helps China to censor bloggers|
|18th Mar 2005||Other Issue||Microsoft Corporation||EU warns on Microsoft behaviour|
|28th Jun 2004||Other Issue||Microsoft Corporation||Microsoft settles anti-trust case|
|13th Apr 2004||Other Issue||Microsoft Corporation||Microsoft settles patents case|
|24th Mar 2004||Other Issue||Microsoft Corporation||Microsoft hit by record EU fine|
|19th Mar 2004||Questionable Practice||Microsoft Corporation||Microsoft facing EU fines|
|27th Jan 2004||Questionable Practice||Microsoft Corporation||EU Anti Competition Investigation|
|15th Dec 2003||Questionable Practice||Microsoft Corporation||Microsoft abandons older Windows|
|8th Jul 2003||Questionable Practice||Microsoft Corporation||Microsoft faces new probe|
|Related Reports from the Computing & IT Industry|
|AOL TimeWarner||Fraud Investigation||Time Warner fraud charge settled|
|Livedoor||Fraud Investigation||Top Japanese fund manager charged|
|Computer Associates||Fraud Investigation||Computer Associates ex-CEO pleads guilty|
|Questionable Practice||Google discrimination lawsuit|
|AOL TimeWarner||Other Issue||AOL apology for search data error|
|© 2006 Corp-Ethics.com | Corporate Ethics|