Corp-Ethics Home
Log In | Register New User
Home Company Search Related Articles Forum (new!)

Company Morgan Stanley [Company Info]
  Track this Company (an email will be sent to you everytime a report is filed about this company)

Date Issue Title
20th Jul 2005 Other Issue Pension fund sues Morgan Stanley

Report
A pension fund that holds shares of Morgan Stanley has sued the giant investment bank's directors, claiming they wasted corporate assets through "grotesque mismanagement," including paying more than $100 million to two departing executives.

The suit, filed yesterday in U.S. District Court in Manhattan by the Central Laborers' Pension Fund, calls the estimated total payouts in cash and benefits to former chief executive Philip Purcell and co-president Stephen Crawford excessive and designed to "buy their silence and cooperation" to protect the directors.

"This escalating of CEO payments just seems to go on and on. . . . Enough is enough," Edward Smith, the pension fund chairman, said during a press conference yesterday.

The fund has more than 7,000 shares of Morgan Stanley.

The suit also accuses the board of negligence in its handling of a lawsuit by financier Ronald Perelman. In May, Perelman won $1.45 billion in damages in a suit that accused Morgan Stanley of defrauding him in a 1998 deal.

Tuesday's action was filed as a derivative suit on behalf of Morgan Stanley shareholders. Such actions are filed when a corporate board is "disabled and unable to sue" because they "participated in the wrongdoing" being alleged, according to William Lerach, the pension fund's attorney in the case. He said others might join in the action.

Purcell received approximately $106 million when he stepped down in June under criticism from shareholders and a group of dissident former executives over his strategy for the company.

Crawford, co-president of Morgan Stanley for 3 1/2 months, departed earlier this month with a pay deal worth $32 million.

Morgan Stanley didn't return calls seeking comment.

Defense lawyers in securities cases said courts "hesitate to second-guess the board of directors" unless there are undisclosed conflicts of interest, said Christopher Bebel, a former federal prosecutor who is a defense attorney in Houston.

Ernest Badway, of the Newark firm Saiber Schlesinger Satz and Goldstein, said the board had sought "a calm, efficient" management transition.

Other Reports on Morgan Stanley
Date Issue Company Report
17th Aug 2008 Questionable Practice Morgan Stanley US banks give clients $7bn refund
18th May 2005 Fraud Investigation Morgan Stanley Morgan Stanley faces $850m payout
12th Jan 2005 Fraud Investigation Morgan Stanley Morgan Stanley hit by record fine

Related Reports from the Financial Industry
Company Issue Report
Marsh & McLennan Fraud Investigation Marsh pays $850m to end charges
Deloitte & Touche Fraud Investigation Parmalat auditors to stand trial
Refco Fraud Investigation Ex-US Justice Dept. fraud chief to probe Refco
Ernst & Young Questionable Practice Judge fines Ernst & Young for allegedly understating net worth
FleetBoston Fraud Investigation Fleet Boston agrees to pay fines
 
Contact Us | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Add Report | Links
© 2006 Corp-Ethics.com | Corporate Ethics